Religion

From Bwtm

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 21:43, 8 May 2006
Beachblogger (Talk | contribs)
not welcome in alpine
← Previous diff
Revision as of 04:43, 2 June 2006
Beachblogger (Talk | contribs)
Buddhism
Next diff →
Line 36: Line 36:
==Buddhism== ==Buddhism==
 +
 +===Zen monk Thich Nhat Hanh===
 +
 +What I would say to Osama Bin laden ?
 +Zen monk Thich Nhat Hanh talks about how listening is the first step towards peace
 +Interview by Ann A. Simpkinson
 +http://www.buddhismtoday.com/english/world/facts/Bin_Laden.htm
 +
 +Question: If you could speak to Osama bin Laden, what would you say to him? Likewise, if you were to speak to the American people, what would you suggest we do at this point, individually and as a nation?
 +
 +If I were given the opportunity to be face to face with Osama bin Laden, the first thing I would do is listen. I would try to understand why he had acted in that cruel way. I would try to understand all of the suffering that had led him to violence. It might not be easy to listen in that way, so I would have to remain calm and lucid. I would need several friends with me, who are strong in the practice of deep listening, listening without reacting, without judging and blaming. In this way, an atmosphere of support would be created for this person and those connected so that they could share completely, trust that they are really being heard.
 +
 +After listening for some time, we might need to take a break to allow what has been said to enter into our consciousness. Only when we felt calm and lucid would we respond. We would respond point by point to what had been said. We would respond gently but firmly in such a way to help them to discover their own misunderstandings so that they will stop violent acts from their own will.
 +
 +For the American people, I would suggest that we do everything we can to restore our calm and our lucidity before responding to the situation. To respond too quickly before we have much understanding of the situation may be very dangerous. The first thing we can do is to cool the flames of anger and hatred that are so strong in us. As mentioned before, it is crucial to look at the way we feed the hatred and violence within us and to take immediate steps to cut off the nourishment for our hatred and violence.
 +
 +When we react out of fear and hatred, we do not yet have a deep understanding of the situation. Our action will only be a very quick and superficial way of responding to the situation and not much true benefit and healing will occur. Yet if we wait and follow the process of calming our anger, looking deeply into the situation, and listening with great will to understand the roots of suffering that are the cause of the violent actions, only then will we have sufficient insight to respond in such a way that healing and reconciliation can be realized for everyone involved.
 +In South Africa, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission has made attempts to realize this. All the parties involved in violence and injustice agreed to listen to each other in a calm and supportive environment, to look together deeply at the roots of violent acts and to find agreeable arrangements to respond to the situations. The presence of strong spiritual leaders is very helpful to support and maintain such an environment. We can look at this model for resolving conflicts that are arising right in the present moment; we do not have to wait many years to realize this.
===Dalai Lama=== ===Dalai Lama===

Revision as of 04:43, 2 June 2006

Religion is a personal or institutionalized organized system grounded in the belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe.

Typical Religious image
Typical Religious image

Contents

There is no God

Sorry to have to break this to you.

Spirituality

Spirituality is a personal belief system which comes from the individuals own experiences. Religion teaches a belief system created by others; not always with altruistic motives.

Spirituality comes from within, religion comes from without.

Humanism

There are no valid supernatural explanations for why the world exists. Nor are any needed. See the Affirmations of Humanism.

Existentialism

Existentialism: A philosophy that emphasizes the uniqueness and isolation of the individual experience in a hostile or indifferent universe, regards human existence as unexplainable, and stresses freedom of choice and responsibility for the consequences of one's acts.

Ethical Egoism

Ethical Egoism: The ethical doctrine that morality has its foundations in self-interest; that personal behavior which benefits the individual is ethical if it does not harm others. There is a far reaching aspect to this which requires restraint so as to avoid disappointment and pain.

Flying Spaghetti Monster

The decline of prirates has caused Global Warming
The decline of prirates has caused Global Warming

The Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM) is the subject of a satirical website created by Bobby Henderson in 2005 to protest the decision by the Kansas State Board of Education to require the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to biological evolution. In the site, Henderson facetiously professes belief in a supernatural Creator entity that resembles spaghetti and meatballs and suggests that Flying Spaghetti Monsterism should be taught in science classrooms.

The Flying Spaghetti Monster has become the center of an Internet phenomenon, with followers who call themselves Pastafarians, a play on "Rastafarians."

ENLIGHTENMENT INSTITUTE

Buddhism

Zen monk Thich Nhat Hanh

What I would say to Osama Bin laden ? Zen monk Thich Nhat Hanh talks about how listening is the first step towards peace Interview by Ann A. Simpkinson http://www.buddhismtoday.com/english/world/facts/Bin_Laden.htm

Question: If you could speak to Osama bin Laden, what would you say to him? Likewise, if you were to speak to the American people, what would you suggest we do at this point, individually and as a nation?

If I were given the opportunity to be face to face with Osama bin Laden, the first thing I would do is listen. I would try to understand why he had acted in that cruel way. I would try to understand all of the suffering that had led him to violence. It might not be easy to listen in that way, so I would have to remain calm and lucid. I would need several friends with me, who are strong in the practice of deep listening, listening without reacting, without judging and blaming. In this way, an atmosphere of support would be created for this person and those connected so that they could share completely, trust that they are really being heard.

After listening for some time, we might need to take a break to allow what has been said to enter into our consciousness. Only when we felt calm and lucid would we respond. We would respond point by point to what had been said. We would respond gently but firmly in such a way to help them to discover their own misunderstandings so that they will stop violent acts from their own will.

For the American people, I would suggest that we do everything we can to restore our calm and our lucidity before responding to the situation. To respond too quickly before we have much understanding of the situation may be very dangerous. The first thing we can do is to cool the flames of anger and hatred that are so strong in us. As mentioned before, it is crucial to look at the way we feed the hatred and violence within us and to take immediate steps to cut off the nourishment for our hatred and violence.

When we react out of fear and hatred, we do not yet have a deep understanding of the situation. Our action will only be a very quick and superficial way of responding to the situation and not much true benefit and healing will occur. Yet if we wait and follow the process of calming our anger, looking deeply into the situation, and listening with great will to understand the roots of suffering that are the cause of the violent actions, only then will we have sufficient insight to respond in such a way that healing and reconciliation can be realized for everyone involved. In South Africa, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission has made attempts to realize this. All the parties involved in violence and injustice agreed to listen to each other in a calm and supportive environment, to look together deeply at the roots of violent acts and to find agreeable arrangements to respond to the situations. The presence of strong spiritual leaders is very helpful to support and maintain such an environment. We can look at this model for resolving conflicts that are arising right in the present moment; we do not have to wait many years to realize this.

Dalai Lama

He told the broadsheet that Westerners had become self-absorbed, burdened with too much choice.

"It is fascinating. In the West, you have bigger homes, yet smaller families; you have endless conveniences - yet you never seem to have any time. You can travel anywhere in the world, yet you don't bother to cross the road to meet your neighbours," he said.

"I don't think people have become more selfish, but their lives have become easier and that has spoilt them. They have less resilience, they expect more, they constantly compare themselves to others and they have too much choice - which brings no real freedom."

The Ten Commandments

Poem: "The Ten Commandments" by Anonymous. Public domain.

I. Have thou no other gods but me,
II. And to no image bow thy knee.
III. Take not the name of God in vain:
IV. The sabbath day do not profane.
V. Honour thy father and mother too;
VI. And see that thou no murder do.
VII. Abstain from words and deeds unclean;
VIII. Nor steal, though thou art poor and mean.
IX. Bear not false witness, shun that blot;
X. What is thy neighbor's covet not.

These laws, O Lord, write in my heart, that I,
May in thy faithful service live and die.

I often wonder if radical right-wing religious people like President Bush have every really read, and thought about, the Ten Commandments.

Christian Fascism

Ominous signs

Ominous signs are all around us concerning the accrual of power into the hands of the Presidency. If Mr. Bush stays in office I think our future will continue to witness shrinking political rights, financial collapse and endless war. Part of the power and seduction of this administration emerges from its diabolical manipulation of Christian rhetoric. I want to flesh out the ideology of the Christian Fascism that Mr. Bush articulates. It is a form of Christianity that is the mirror opposite of what Jesus embodied. It is, indeed, the materialization of the spirit of antichrist: a perversion of Christian faith and practice.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5648.htm

not welcome in alpine

I made a new car roof sign and at the forum they asked me to take it down because it was 'disrespectful'. I finally did after showing them the First and arguing. This, to me, is typical of how Bush and Hunter have divided our country: the Neo-cons have made smear and slander standard operating procedure. The people at the church didn't come to me, they went to others behind my back. I walked right up to them and introduced myself and asked what the problem was. Dumpin' Duncan is mild compared to the slander heaped on liberals by the right wing hate community (Hunter included). I feel sorry for the minister in Alpine, he feared for his job if he allowed me to display my sign, poor guy, to be so weak. He served 30years in the Navy and then to have Randall Cuningham dishonor that by taking bribes and sex and blame it on serving in the Navy. The neo-cons will slander and then turn around and call foul on the slightest response from their victims.

In the future ECUPAC should avoid conflict of interest: just stay out of churches. The founding fathers were very clear that there is to be a separation between church and state. They intended not only freedom of religion but also freedom from religion. If the church cannot abide, even for 2hours, to live fully by the First Amendment, but must exclude those who do not worship at the Alter of the Neo-con, they should not loan out their halls.


When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent; I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats, I remained silent; I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists, I did not speak out; I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews, I did not speak out; I was not a Jew.

When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.

Once you trample on the First Amendment, what other right won't you violate?

not welcome in alpine

reference links:

[Philosophical Ethics]